Talk:Epic Rap Battles of History 62/@comment-5507479-20160610185604/@comment-7464192-20160610224000

The battle doesn't need a third party. Some people really need to learn what justifies a third-party. If they bring something completely new to the table that really brings about an outsider's look on things (Jobs vs Gates, Romney vs Obama), if it's a special ocassion like a finale or premiere (Rasputin vs Stalin, Ghostbusters vs Mythbusters, Spielberg vs Hitchcock), or if it's some kind of metaphor for something (Henson vs Lee), then we can have a third party. Maybe if another legitimate reason is brought up and reasonable then sure. Any variations of this knive-finger battle with a third party is just having a third party for the sake of having a third party. It's so rare for us to discuss a battle without a third party being thrown in, yet so rarely are third-parties actually thrown in. Obviously third-parties are a rare thing that we shouldn't automatically assume is happening all the time