Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-218.61.195.104-20130109134739/@comment-24094060-20130119230655

To Scrawland:

People who coexisted knowing each other BUT are opposing rivals can be made as a battle (Gates vs Jobs, Obama vs Romney). Lenin and Stalin won't work though, for the reasons Scrawland stated, and it apparently would be better if it were a recent modern rivalry.

George Washington and George W. Bush are presidents named George, but I don't want to see that, as Obama is more recent and used.

Yeah, I don't get what the WC is trying to say there.

To the wikia contributor:

1. Dude, we actually know who Stephen King is. You also spelled it wrong.

Walt Disney vs Seth MacFarlane/Matt Groening

Edgar Allan Poe vs Stephen King

2. Al Capone vs Tony Montana

3. Too much history there. King Henry VIII vs Hillary Clinton is scrapped for the moment.

4. Gandhi vs Hulk, maybe someone else against Hercules

5. NO. Ash Ketchum vs Charles Darwin

6. George Washington vs another powerful leader (as long as it's someone)

7. Nostradamus has a possibility of being in one, but against Mayans? THE Mayans?! The entire group, really? You could have even googled up some famous Mayan or something if you wanted that.

8. Yeh, no. You didn't even bother looking them up. I don't even play Minecraft and know it was made by Notch. The characters aren't all well known, you're just saying that for a battle. And in the future, Wall-E will be the only person who is still playing Minecraft.

9. "For the laughs"

...

What?

10. Again, how about no. If you're really telling us we have to look them up in the first place, it should kind of tell you something.