Talk:Epic Rap Battles of History 65/@comment-29316102-20160824020857/@comment-1143631-20160824102405

I mean the way I put it is a little wordy, but in simpler terms: They're both country saviors and WWII heroes. I like the idea of two heroes who were placed in the same position at the same time (just with different countries) arguing over which one handled it better. I think it's more specific than any other Churchill suggestion I've heard aside from maybe David Cameron. Henry is just British leaders I think, I don't really see why they'd have beef, and Teddy Roosevelt I don't really get the connection for anyway.

As for it being "boring" Is WWII vs. WWII really that much more boring than WWII vs. early 20th century, or WWII vs. 16th century? WWII is a really exciting historical topic. We've already had Tesla vs. Edison, which was a less exciting and older time period, and Shaka vs. Caesar, which were both less exciting and more ancient time periods.