User blog comment:DudeWithASuit/Fourth Official Wiki Rap Tournament/@comment-5482968-20150721193057

I'm sort of surprised, but also not surprised that people are for lack of a better word "upset" about picking Andy. On one had, there is the argument about picking SANT and the potential for a rematch between Andy and Noah. No one seemed to bring this argument up last year for Phil being brought in to replace YTK, and he never did go on to face his earlier opponent, Four, losing to eventual tourney winner Bob. As well, last year Phil had the closest margin and therefore having him go on made sense because he was almost the winner, the same as the logic behind using Andy. Not to mention, ignoring percentage, Andy's battle was considered the best by the most people, as can be seen by that poll up there^. In fact, for a loser, Andy got more votes than a large portion of the actual winners. That ought to mean something. In comparison, SANT lost by roughly 10% more than the 4 battles that had only a 2 vote margin. People kept calling Noah vs Andrew insanely close. Shouldn't the one who almost won be given a chance?

Wall of text may not be coherent upon closer inspection.