Talk:Upcoming ERB suggestions/@comment-7464192-20130712152046/@comment-24094060-20130712204139

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Leonardo da Vinci is liek, the smartest guy who ever lived.

Yet you can't complain about putting him against someone who is also Leonardo just because they have the same name. Look at Napoleon vs Napoleon, who put an awesome military leader and ruler against some geek from a fictional movie. Better a martial arts turtle than that. BUT DiCaprio is an awesome actor, despite not receiving ONE DAMN OSCAR.

Now while I think both of them are good, as well as being ERB material (someone dressed up as Leonardo isn't that difficult, the shell just covers most of the body, and it sure seems as possible as Goku), the other reason it's acceptable is that both of them that are possibly against Da Vinci are known by people in modern times, by those watching DiCaprio's movies or the TMNT cartoon. HOWEVER, I think putting Da Vinci against a painter is UNACCEPTABLE! There's people like Van Gogh, Bob Ross, Picasso, Warhol, and others who have painting as their ONLY job, while Leonardo da Vinci is an inventor, mathematician, engineer, and other things to list, but to have him in only ONE of his areas isn't good enough, because compared to others, he might be the best, but he's more than just an artist.

Also, the Da Vinci vs Lil Wayne thing's a joke, he just gets an auto-win because it's the best artist ever vs the worst artists ever, however, he should still be against a modern day character, not some guy from ancient times if they're not from the past century. If that happens, it won't get attraction as an ERB, cause I mean, it needs more recognizable figures rather than only history all the time. This is why Columbus went against Captain Kirk, a captain known better in modern times, not Marco Polo, or Mozart against Skrillex, a music composer from pop culture, not someone like Tchaikovsky.

So the conclusion is:

THEY'RE EQUAL!!! KEEP THEM!!! GOOD DAY.