Thread:WonderPikachu12/@comment-9623756-20160912235949

So today you have allocated me a three day ban for "harassment". First of, I would like to point out how ludicrous it is to allocate a ban to someone when you havent been in chat to witness anything that was happening. Can you tell me what acts of "harassment" occured? No, because you were not present to see them.

You know who was present? Tiger, another member of the staff on the wiki. He was in chat when the incident of the "harassment" supposedly occured. He didnt take action until expressly told by you, someone who wasnt present, but was instead informed of the events by somoene else involved within them.

Lets not be under any illusions that we all know who this person is. I respect cave's right to come running to you whenever he feels like someone has commited a crime (although I do feel like the end decision should be left up to the staff member present, not one who hasnt been in chat for any of the events). Cave is only one person, however, and was just as involved in the alleged "harassment" as me. Should his word count for anymore than mine. I can honestly say that I dont think I harassed anyone at all this evening.

My end question is a fairly simple one. How can you rightfully explain banning me for three days when your entire knowledge of what you say happened comes from one biased source? How can you say that you were in a position to allocate blame and punishment to me, even though there was one of your fellow staff members in chat to punish people for breaking rules if they consider them to be broken?

I do anticipate some comments along the line of "TL;DR" or "Its only three days get over it", but I feel there is a serious need for explanation here.  