Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25373400-20170214085907/@comment-25373400-20170215080206

Thank you for your reply, legion! I'm just responding because I like to make disucssions but it's completely your freedom to reply further on.

 >neither should be used, because Sherlock and Batman already have a million breads i mean materials

 Sure. What do you think of simply doing Batman vs Sherlock 2 tho?

 >only if Ho Chi Minh backs up Mao

 No. Ho Chi Minh is not related to Mao and it doesn't make any sense in Vietnam teaming up with China. Mao vs Castro & Che Guevara can happen like Newton vs Nye & Tyson did

>apparently religion and compassion are irrational

I meant rational as in scientific, that wasn't the main point I wanted to insist

>Freud vs Teresa AND Wolverine vs Kreuger are both terrible ideas and I'm 100000000% behind this idea  > Ronaldo vs Messi would be ideal  > Musk vs Stark is popular  > Tay vs Henry is amazing

yay :D

 > because real-life beefs are boring and there's already a pre-determined winner

 I don't agree, Jobs vs Gates or Trump vs Clinton are amazing battles. Also just because one defeated another in history doesn't mean that it determines the winner of the rap battle. And what's so interesting about Andrew Jackson? Why does it have to be him vs Lionheart?

>Snow White vs Elsa without the other ones and/or Aquaman vs Ariel vs Percy Jackson, Cinderella and Rapunzel could MAYBE be worthy with a good connection but otherwise nah, and Belle is just straight-up nah without the Beast

I understand your point except Aquaman vs Ariel vs Percy Jackson seems like a bad idea to me. Ariel and Aquaman don't deserve to be a title rapper position, and Percy Jackson is not worthy

 >Coco isn't worthy

 What???? No way. She's one of the most important female figures in the 20th century. If Shaka Zulu or Lewis and Clark can appear than absolutely yes for her

 >and Antoinette should back up King Louis

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;text-align:left;">Which King Louis? If you're talking about XVI, I don't think he's worthy as a rapper. If XIV, they are irrelevant so she shouldn't back up him

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;text-align:left;">>Zorro vs Billy the Kid because sword duels vs gun duels

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;text-align:left;">This one, I see a lot and I struggle to explain why I do not like it. Zorro sure is an interesting character, but I like how Hood and Kid are both in the gray zone of historical  and legendary (Billy the Kid did exist but his portrayal includes many myths). Not a fan of  Billy the Kid vs Ned Kelly and Robin Hood vs Green Arrow because there's not much clashes of contrast; they're relatively similar.

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;text-align:left;">>Astronomers vs Astronauts shouldn't have Aldrin or Collins, it should have Gagarin and Cernan

<p style="font-weight:normal;font-size:14px;text-align:left;">But why would Gagarin team up with the US? And what I like about team battles is that how historical figures with great achievements but  relatively obscure are given chance to be recognized by the audience. The Apollo 11 crew was one of the most significant trio that changed history, yet mostly Armstrong and partly Aldrin takes away all of the credits. However, if it weren't for Collins waiting for them in the spaceship and be in charge of security, the two wouldn't have made the giant leap of mankind. I think one of the reason why ERB is so interesting is because they can educate us with these kind of facts. I'd like to see Collins given spotlight (and he can be dissed for how obscure he is), and I think the Apollo crew is the best trio to go against the three giants of astronomy.