Talk:Epic Rap Battles of History 59/@comment-24322797-20160326044318/@comment-2059666-20160326170741

Flats, this is still THE lex Luthor. Yes, he's the "son", but it's still supposed to represent the character that we know - the archenemy of Superman. And no, it was not unique. It was essentially what Jim Carrey did with the Riddler, and it's terrible. Having a character be "crazy" is not new or unique,most just inaccurate. The cool thing about the Joker and Lex is that they contrast each other. But now we have a bald joker.