Talk:Hints/@comment-6533831-20150729173601/@comment-8120913-20150802215918

Andy Warhol is definitely worthy of a battle. I really hope Pete didn't say other artists aren't worthy because there are plenty that really are. But on the subject on who would face Andy.

I personally never cared for many opponents against Andy Warhol (my absolute favorite artist of all time) but Vincent van Gogh, & Salvador Dali have always been my favorite options. [See AccordionChick Rap Battles - Andy Warhol VS Salvador Dali] I like the idea of Pop VS a more "traditional movement". Andy was criticized more often than not for his work being "not art" & just for cash but it may have not been seen that way through his eyes, so he'd stand up against a more "respected" artist. Andy is more subtle & quiet so seeing someone with a larger personality like Dali, would be a wonderful opponent IMO. Or even Vincent van Gogh, he dealt with many mental issues sadly so I mean they could use that to escalate the emotions of his character. Some people have suggested Bansky. Well, Banksy is pretty cool but he's not way too different as he usually uses stencils in a sort of Pop way to create his art. Andy might be more likely to admire or like his work say to that compared of van Gogh or Dali or even Rembrandt. The idea of Banksy being portrayed just as a hooded guy with no face would basically be perfect if he's ever used too but I don't like the idea too much because there's not much contrast besides the way every other artist (non-Pop) would contrast to Andy. Also for van Gogh, he never made any money while he was living, which further added to his depression, whereas Warhol made lots of cash for his commissions & using Pop art for commercial things.