Talk:J. Robert Oppenheimer/@comment-44514419-20191126143445/@comment-31549155-20200114213928

Except that Deadpool and Boba Fett got the EXACT same amount of lines, 22 each to be exact. And while Jefferson vs Douglass was a bit biased, Douglass only got 2 more lines than Jefferson if you find that a problem.

I can admit that they have done a couple of biased battles in the past, like Banner vs Jenner or Douglass vs Jefferson (which don't really get that ruined to me as people tend to say) but trying to say that Ash vs Darwin or Deadpool vs Boba Fett were intentionally biased? Two of the fairest ones out there?

You overall seem so scared of a battle being the terrible thing known as "biased" like if at the end of the day you couldn't decide yourself who won, and that other commenter pulling over 10 battles that he thinks were intentionally biased, just shows that people can say that any battle they didn't liked was clearly biased.

But anyways, looking back at this comment now is pretty funny, seeing as Oppenheimer has overwhelmingly won the battle by everyone and Thanos is barely getting any votes. Goes to show that things don't tend to go as you were expecting.