User blog comment:DudeWithASuit/Community Discussion: Replacement/@comment-4872155-20150902220455

To be completely honest, I don't like the idea that just because these users are rollbacks it automatically makes them the best candidates for mod. No offence to any of you obviously, but these people were chosen for rollback for being trustworthy and good editors. Being trustworthy and good editors isn't all the same as being a mod. Yes, being trustworthy is important, but you also need to be able to completely handle situations well, which I'm not so sure about. Anyways, enough ranting. Now to my thoughts on the candidates.

Tiger; I see you as a good user and hear you handle situations well. However, I haven't seen you on chat enough to make a verdict, so I'm gonna go neutral on you.

A6; I consider you as a good friend but like you've told me previously, you tend to be argumentative at times. I know you are trying to work on it, but for now I'm gonna have to oppose you.

Night; I honestly think you'd be an alright mod, but tbh I think it'd be best if you stayed as rollback. I'll vote neutral on you.

GG; Although you cover that time gap that needs filling, I'm not sure if you're ready for mod yet, GG. I'm gonna have to oppose you.

Final verdict: Tiger, neutral; A6, oppose; Night, neutral; GG, oppose.