Talk:William Wallace/@comment-25274427-20140616002046/@comment-25274427-20140616030831

WonderPikachu, you're just straight up rude. There's no need for stooping to name calling and being an all-around ass. Your attitude disqualifies your opinion, and makes me think you have nothing valuable to say. I hesitate to apologise for offending you because you're not doing yourself any favours.

As you said, you know nothing of William Wallace and what he represents.

Washington Vs. Bush would've been fine because it IS 'murican and not masquerading as 'revolutionary leaders.' I'll let you in on a secret... revolutionary leaders do not like Washington at all. He represents something completely different... he didn't fight for freedom, he fought for control. He hardly led a ragtag bunch of underdogs... he led the largest, wealthiest, most powerful country in the world. It was hardly a rebellion; it was the establishment of a new world order.

I just asked some friends what they thought of this match up (none of us are 'muricans), and they said it was "no good, even offensive." Not every one thinks like you (Thank God).