Talk:Rick Grimes vs Walter White/@comment-15589301-20140207154302

Nixon, you do realise when you TRIED to explain the connection between Grimes and White you couldn't? You just described it in a way that makes it sound way more awesome then it actually is, by taking minor factors of each character, and making it sound like that's why they are being suggested to battle each other. It's incredibly easy to make something sound like there is a connection when there really isn't. Here, I'll show you an example by describing *shudders* Tobuscus vs Pewdiepie.(Keep in mind there is absolutely no truth in what I'm about to say.

Tobuscus vs Pewdiepie, isn't just a battle between two youtube icons, but between different ideals, countries, and other factors. The differences between the two really bring out the differences in every human being, and as a result, is really a battle between everyone. Everyone has different opinions, and this battle just symbolises that. It is between two people who people argue over, and describe as the best, showing everyone's different attitudes to different styles and how not everyone shares the same interest.

You see what I did here? This is exactly what you did. You described what a battle is, to make the connection sound more awesome then it actually is, when in reality, there is little connection between them. Symbolism, does not determine what makes a good battle, because every suggestion, no matter how shitty it is, can show symbolism. You've just got to look hard enough, like you have for White vs Grimes, and try to scrape something out of it. If it was a good connection, you wouldn't have to go so deep into it, just to try and find a reason for why they should battle each other. Walter White vs Marie Curie. The connection is scientists linked too chemistry, who met a terrible fate from cancer. The fact that you had to right a whole paragraph, to try and explain why White vs Grimes is a good idea, proves that it is actually quite bad.