Talk:Epic Rap Battles of History 65/@comment-68.66.82.31-20161010170525/@comment-24322797-20161011144452

so, in this comment, you have

1. attacked bill clinton again, which, as we covered, proves nothing

2. attached some meaningless links that prove nothing. "hits on bernie sanders," as explained in your own god damn article, meant things she could use against him in the debate. that's... kind of how debating works, my dude. the other ones im not even sure what you're trying to get at, as none of them say literally anything about these made-up "isis deals" you mentioned, and most of the attention from one of them is still fucking centered around Bill who isn't running for president.

3. "trump has more money," yet is several million in debt and has gone bankrupt three times.

4. and i think you just said the equivalent of "the clintons have been presidents before so give someone else a turn" in which case i dont even know where to start with that

and regarding the fact that you didn't actually respond to any of my points, tldr; arguing with sega is kinda like arguing with a broken record fused with a brick wall.