User blog comment:Captain Warrior/Hey./@comment-25198011-20130730153322/@comment-25198011-20130730160420

Alright, onto this No Painter vs Da Vinci argument: I feel that whole defense scheme is bullshit, mostly because people feel they're just fine with the original suggestion (bad or not). You see, Frank was more than a singer. He danced, acted, he directed, he produced, ansd he conducted (whatever that means) However, he went against another singer. This was probably because Frank was most famous as a singer. This is the same case with Da Vinci. Da Vinci was most famous as a paint, gawddammit, whether you like it or not. So there's nothing wrong with Picasso vs Da Vinci. Compared the suggested shit we all see on Facebook, Youtube, and the comments on our very own wiki, it's a really good idea. Have a nice cup of coffee from Dunkin Donuts and a nice day.

Now, back to Captain Warrior's response,

thanks for considering. :)